dedecms织梦内容管理系统      
首页 | Science | Chemistry Lab | Astronomy | Else | Related | Biology Tech | Mathematics | Research | 专题 | 会员中心 | 支持论坛
  当前位置:首页>Research>文章内容
New electric motor principle
来源: 作者: 发布时间:2007-10-04  
Hello.

Please, take a read to

www.geocities.com/k_pullo/PM3.htm

It's an study based on the Butch Lafonte's equilibrium motor.
Please, forget the claims, and take a look under classical physical principles.

Basically, on normal motors we use the electric energy to impulse the motor, and get similar mechanical work. On this device, the iron cores do the mechanical work, and the electric energy on coils "hide" the iron cores at proper timing, using electric energy, but almost without doing work.

The simulations give a possitive result.

Could you tell me what do you think?

Forget the regrets about me, or if it's free energy. Just see the physical fact that a magnet between two north poles (or two south poles) could feel no oposition nor atraction to rotate properly disposed. It could just feel no effect, and also it could cause no backEMF effect on the coils.

I wish you could see this fact with clear eyes. Sure you have more knowledge about physics than me, and i hope you could see what i'm talking behind this knowledge to explain if it works like spected, and not using other physics concepts to opose the results with the thermodinamics laws, the enthropy, the losses, the "build-it", etc...

If you answer that the method explained can't work, just tell me how do you get that conclusion. If you talk about all the laws that could restrict the working, please, talk me about how they affect this system specifically, and if you see a solution to avoid that problem, please, let me know.

If i expose this method to "physics people", they will use physics to go against it, not to analyze it.

If i expose this method to "free energy people" they will say it sure works, using physics or not.

So am I alone about this concept?.

Please, i need REAL physics people that uses physics knowledge like a tool, not like a weapon.

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-05-2003, 04:36 AM                  #2
Integral

PF Mentor

Integral's Avatar

Integral is Offline:
Posts: 4,453
[收藏] [推荐] [评论(0条)] [返回顶部] [打印本页] [关闭窗口]  
用户名: 新注册) 密码: 匿名评论
评论内容:(不能超过250字,需审核后才会公布,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
 §最新评论
  热点文章
·发明家爱迪生简介
·高斯简介
·二十世纪的犹太物理学家和数学家
·玻尔-爱因斯坦对话
·卡诺热机理论为什么长期被忽视
·经典物理学大师——牛顿
·理论凝聚态牛人一览
·费曼——教授的尊严
·朗道 vs 费曼
·同济马丁教授在《自然》系列刊物
·牛顿对光学的研究
·丘成桐在数学上的成就
  相关文章
·Elastic Theory L.D.Landau,E.M
·Mechanics L.D.Landau,E.M.Lifs
·Graph Theory B.Bollobas
·Optics M.H.Freeman
·Lectures on Riemann Surfaces.
·物理系学生的万千法门
·玻尔-爱因斯坦对话
·费曼:关于科学的演讲
·我的立场 史蒂芬.霍金
·汤川秀树:科学家的创造性
·李远哲:怎样才能作好一个科学家
·二十世纪的犹太物理学家和数学家
Power by Jjwwo.com